Why I Didn’t Create a Brand in 24 Hours

June 20, 2026
 · 
3 min read

A few days ago, I received a certificate for completing the Create a Brand in 24 Hours with AI course on Domestika.

It sounds impressive.

And, at the same time, a little amusing.

Because although the course is called Create a Brand in 24 Hours, my brand wasn’t created in 24 hours.

It took considerably longer.

Not because AI wasn’t capable enough.

Not because the process was particularly complicated.

Simply because I started with a question that every branding project should begin with:

What exactly are we selling?

The Problem with Branding That Starts with a Logo

For years, the creative industry has taught companies that a brand starts with:

  • a logo,
  • colors,
  • typography,
  • a website.

In reality, it works the other way around.

First, there is a product.

Then comes the value that product delivers.

Next comes the way people think about it.

Only after that does visual identity enter the picture.

If we don't know:

  • what problem we solve,
  • who we solve it for,
  • why someone should choose us over competitors,

then designing a logo is a bit like choosing curtains for a house that hasn't been built yet.

Where I Started

Instead of jumping straight into visual exploration, I began by creating my own:

Enterprise Brand Guidelines & Product Positioning Framework.

The goal was not to design a logo.

The goal was to understand:

  • what the product actually is,
  • what change it creates for users,
  • what emotions it should evoke,
  • how it should sound,
  • how it should behave across every customer touchpoint.

Only then did the visual decisions begin to make sense.

A Logo Is a Byproduct

This is probably the most valuable lesson I took away from both the course and my own professional experience.

A strong logo doesn't exist because a designer had a brilliant idea.

It exists because dozens of smaller strategic decisions were made beforehand.

If a brand is meant to be:

  • bold,
  • technical,
  • approachable,
  • expert,
  • premium,

those qualities should not be visible only in the logo.

They should be reflected in:

  • the language it uses,
  • the product experience,
  • the sales process,
  • marketing materials,
  • customer support.

The logo is simply the most visible part of a much larger system.

AI Doesn't Replace Thinking

After completing the course, I became even more convinced that AI is an extraordinary tool.

But it is still just a tool.

It can accelerate:

  • research,
  • exploration of directions,
  • concept generation,
  • first drafts of messaging.

What it cannot do is answer the question:

Why should this product exist in the first place?

That responsibility still belongs to people.

What This Course Taught Me

The most valuable lesson wasn't creating another mood board or logo.

It was a reminder that a brand doesn't live on a homepage.

A brand lives in decisions.

In the way a product solves problems.

In how customers feel after they buy.

In whether the promise made by marketing matches reality.

When those elements work together, visual identity becomes a natural extension of strategy.

When they don't, even the most beautiful logo won't help much.

So after completing this course, I can confidently say one thing:

You can start designing a brand in 24 hours.

But building a good brand still requires something that no tool can accelerate.

A deep understanding of the product, the user, and the problem you're trying to solve.

The Outcome of the Training

As part of the course, I developed a complete brand concept for Metricon, including product positioning, brand values, communication principles, and visual identity.

Most importantly, the project did not begin with logo sketches. It started with defining the product's purpose, its place in the market, and the decision-making process it was designed to support.

Only then did the name, messaging framework, visual direction, and logo emerge.

The board below presents the outcome of the training and demonstrates how product strategy was translated into a cohesive brand system.

You can read the full case study and explore the complete process here:

Metricon — Brand & Product Strategy Case Study

My Books

Featured Image
Enterprise tables often fail because they are treated as data containers instead of operational workspaces. This article explains how better interaction hierarchy improves complex systems.
Featured Image
There’s a question recruiters love to ask: “What’s the most challenging design problem you’ve faced?” Most people expect a story about a difficult stakeholder, a broken design system, or a last-minute release crisis. Mine …
Featured Image
Instagram stopped being “just a photo app” a long time ago. Today, it’s a massive advertising machine, recommendation engine, e-commerce platform, creator ecosystem, and a battlefield for user data all at once. The problem …

© Zofia Szuca 2024
Brand and product designer